📊 poll results
AI just disproved an 80-year-old Erdős math conjecture, verified by a Fields Medalist — but OpenAI's last "Erdős breakthrough" claim was debunked. Real progress or hype cycle?
🏆 Leading: Handle with skepticism regardless of verification. OpenAI's own track record here includes a debunked claim just seven months earlier, and headline math "breakthroughs" tend to get overstated in the announcement before the dust actually settles.

Handle with skepticism regardless of verification. OpenAI's own track record here includes a debunked claim just seven months earlier, and headline math "breakthroughs" tend to get overstated in the announcement before the dust actually settles. is leading so far with 50%.

This is real, verified original discovery. A genuine sign AI can now generate new science, not just recombine what's already known — and the human verification process by Fields Medalist Tim Gowers and others is exactly how it should work. is second. On this few votes the split is still anyone's guess.

Everyone who has answered so far is voting from China.

The most recent vote came in 22 days ago.

hewsay who say wut? 💬
📊 poll results
AI just disproved an 80-year-old Erdős math conjecture, verified by a Fields Medalist — but OpenAI's last "Erdős breakthrough" claim was debunked. Real progress or hype cycle?
50%
Leading answer
Handle with skepticism regardless of verification. OpenAI's own track record here includes a debunked claim just seven months earlier, and headline math "breakthroughs" tend to get overstated in the announcement before the dust actually settles.
results so far
hewsay.com ↗

Discussion

Vote on one of these nextGrok 4.6, Claude Opus 5, Cursor Ultra, Apple's M6 chip - which of this month's releases actually matters?OpenAI Eyes a Possible $1 Trillion IPO by 2027 While Burning Billions: Legitimate AI Bet or a Bubble Waiting to Pop?48% of Americans hope AI cures cancer or Alzheimer's — but only 15% trust the companies building it. Is that optimism justified?
react to this tea 👀
This is real, verified original discovery. A genuine sign AI can now generate new science, not just recombine what's already known — and the human verification process by Fields Medalist Tim Gowers and others is exactly how it should work.
Math is a uniquely easy domain for this. It's the one field where a computer can formally verify an answer is airtight, like DeepMind's Lean-checked proofs the very next day. That doesn't mean AI can do open-ended science in fields where there's no ground truth to check its work against.
Handle with skepticism regardless of verification. OpenAI's own track record here includes a debunked claim just seven months earlier, and headline math "breakthroughs" tend to get overstated in the announcement before the dust actually settles.