๐Ÿ”ฅ Featured Questions
Hui Ka Yan Sentenced to Life: Genuine Accountability for Evergrande's Fraud or a Scapegoat for China's Property Crisis?

On August 20, 2026, the Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court sentenced Hui Ka Yan (Xu Jiayin), 67, founder of China Evergrande Group, to life in prison after he pleaded guilty to eight charges including fundraising fraud, illegally taking public deposits, fraudulently issuing securities, and bribery. The court fined Evergrande Group 8.82 billion yuan and Evergrande Real Estate Group 7 billion yuan, and ordered confiscation of Hui's personal assets. Prosecutors said Evergrande overstated revenue by tens of billions of dollars in 2019-2020 to sustain borrowing, while the group's total liabilities topped $300 billion before its 2021 default helped trigger China's broader property-sector crisis. More than 50 other Evergrande executives were sentenced alongside Hui, with terms ranging from 22 months to 18 years. Chinese homeowners and investors who lost savings in unfinished apartments and wealth-management products reacted with visible anger online.


Poll as Guest Infographics
From around the web

Similar to hewsay's "Hui Ka Yan Sentenced to Life: Genuine Accountability for Evergrande's Fraud or a Scapegoat for China's Property Crisis?"

Quoted & linked with attribution — not a hewsay user post.
Title: Reddit - The heart of the internet # This Is the End of Chinaโ€™s Once Mightiest Property Firm (Evergrande). [r/China - This Is the End of Chinaโ€™s Once Mightiest Property Firm (Evergrande)](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/24/business/china-evergrande-delisted.html). # Eve...
reddit.com · Reddit
View original
The scapegoat can do well in school, work, and the way they live their life but the parents always compare the scapegoat to the other child and say why canโ€™t you be like so and so? The scapegoat can do well in school, work, and the way they live their life but the parents alwa...
quora.com · Quora
View original
Scientists just "de-extincted" the dire wolf. Which species should be revived next?

In April 2025, Colossal Biosciences announced the birth of three gray wolf pups genetically edited (20 edits across 14 genes) using ancient DNA from a 13,000-year-old tooth and a 72,000-year-old skull to resemble dire wolves, which went extinct about 12,500 years ago. Critics argue this is really just a modified gray wolf, not a true resurrection, since dire wolves are genetically quite distant relatives. Colossal is also chasing the woolly mammoth, the dodo, and the thylacine (Tasmanian tiger), backed by billions in funding. If you could pick one extinct species to bring back with this technology, which one would you choose, and why?

๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ 11 votes so far๐Ÿ† Leading: Thylacine (Tasmanian Tiger)

The thylacine, or Tasmanian tiger, was the largest carnivorous marsupial of modern times until the last known individual died in Hobart Zoo in 1936, decades after bounty hunting for allegedly killing livestock drove the species to collapse. Colossal Biosciences and University of Melbourne researchers are using the fat-tailed dunnart, a mouse-sized marsupial, as a genetic template, guided by an unusually well-preserved thylacine genome extracted from a juvenile specimen kept in ethanol. Because marsupials give birth to tiny, underdeveloped young that finish growing in a pouch, some scientists argue thylacine revival is technically more feasible than mammoth or dodo projects, though still years away.
(55%)
๐Ÿฅˆ Woolly Mammoth

Colossal Biosciences is genetically engineering Asian elephants โ€” their closest living relative โ€” to express mammoth traits like dense fur, thick fat layers, and small ears suited to Arctic cold, using ancient DNA recovered from frozen specimens. The company aims to birth the first calves by 2028 and eventually rewild herds across Siberian tundra, arguing mammoths once trampled trees and compacted snow in ways that kept permafrost frozen, slowing carbon release. Critics counter that the result is really a cold-adapted elephant hybrid, not a true mammoth, and question whether Arctic ecosystems and elephant surrogate mothers are ready for the experiment.
(18%)
๐Ÿฅ‰ None of these โ€” leave extinction alone

Not every scientist โ€” or voter โ€” is convinced de-extinction is worth pursuing. Skeptics point out that roughly one million species are currently at risk of extinction according to UN estimates, and argue the tens of millions of dollars Colossal has raised would save far more biodiversity if spent on habitat protection and anti-poaching efforts instead. There's also a scientific objection: these projects don't produce genetically identical originals, just edited hybrids of living relatives, so calling it 'de-extinction' may overstate what's actually happening. Ecosystems have also changed dramatically since these species vanished, raising questions about whether revived animals could even survive, let alone thrive, in the modern world.
(18%)
๐ŸŒ ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ China

Poll as Guest Infographics
From around the web

Similar to hewsay's "Scientists just "de-extincted" the dire wolf. Which species should be revived next?"

Quoted & linked with attribution — not a hewsay user post.
Scientists have genetically engineered wolves with white hair like the extinct dire wolf. What other animals do you expect scientists to bring back from extinction? Itโ€™s actually quite important we donโ€™t go around telling people that dire wolves have been brought back from ext...
quora.com · Quora
View original
IUCN Canid Specialist Group statement on Colossal "Dire Wolves" : r/Paleontology. Skip to main contentIUCN Canid Specialist Group statement on Colossal "Dire Wolves" : r/Paleontology. IUCN Canid Specialist Group statement on Colossal "Dire Wolves". Colossal convinced thousands...
reddit.com · Reddit
View original

Never miss a new question

One email per question, straight to your inbox. Unsubscribe anytime.