In May 2026, an OpenAI model made an unexpected cross-disciplinary leap: it linked a 1946 Erdős geometry puzzle (how many pairs of points on a plane can sit exactly one unit apart) to a completely unrelated 1964 algebraic number theory result, and used that connection to construct point arrangements beating every approach mathematicians had tried in 80 years — disproving Erdős's conjecture. Nine mathematicians, including Fields Medalist Tim Gowers, reviewed and confirmed the core ideas, calling it "a milestone in AI mathematics." One day later, Google DeepMind's AlphaProof Nexus independently solved nine more open Erdős problems using Lean, a system that checks proofs line by line rather than relying on a human reading them over. The catch: this isn't the first "AI cracks Erdős problems" headline. In October 2025, an earlier OpenAI claim of solving ten Erdős problems was thoroughly debunked by the math community. This time, unlike last time, independent mathematicians verified the work before it was announced.
Similar to hewsay's "AI just disproved an 80-year-old Erdős math conjecture, verified by a Fields Medalist — but OpenAI's last "Erdős breakthrough" claim was debunked. Real progress or hype cycle?"
Prime Numbers from previous Prime Numbers : r/math Skip to main contentPrime Numbers from previous Prime Numbers : r/math Open menu Open navigationGo to Reddit Home r/math A chip A close button Log InLog in to Reddit Expand user menu Open settings menu This subreddit is for di...
Title: Gerd Faltings wins the 2026 Abel Prize! : r/math # Gerd Faltings wins the 2026 Abel Prize! Skip to main contentGerd Faltings wins the 2026 Abel Prize! Open menu Open navigationGo to Reddit Home. Get App Get the Reddit app Log InLog in to Reddit. Expand user menu Open se...
Imagine a future where a round-trip to any planet takes a single afternoon and your safety is fully guaranteed — no radiation, no gravity issues, no return-trip math. NASA's probes have sent back stunning close-up imagery of each of these three worlds, and each one offers a wildly different experience: scorched-red desert canyons, a planet-sized storm system, or rings you could sail a ship through. Which one would actually be worth the trip, and why? Would you chase the eerie stillness of Mars, the psychedelic beauty of Saturn's rings, or the raw power of Jupiter's Great Red Spot?

🏆 Leading: Mars — the Red Planet, famous for Olympus Mons (the largest volcano in the solar system), ancient dry riverbeds hinting at a wetter past, and dust storms big enough to swallow the entire globe. NASA's Perseverance and Curiosity rovers are exploring its surface right now, and it's the top candidate for future human colonization. (39%)
🥈 Jupiter — the largest planet in the solar system, a gas giant so massive its gravity shapes the orbits of everything else nearby. Its Great Red Spot is a storm bigger than Earth that has raged for at least 350 years, and its moon Europa is suspected to hide a liquid-water ocean beneath an icy crust. (33%)
🥉 Saturn — instantly recognizable for its dazzling ring system made of ice and rock debris, ranging from dust-sized grains to house-sized chunks. This gas giant has dozens of moons, including Titan, which has its own thick atmosphere and lakes of liquid methane on its surface. (28%)🌍 🇨🇳 ChinaSimilar to hewsay's "If you could safely visit one planet in our solar system, which would you pick?"
If given a chance, what moon or planet in the solar system would you choose to go to? If given a chance, what moon or planet in the solar system would you choose to go to? Originally Answered: If you had the opportunity to visit another planet in our solar system, which planet...
If you could live on any planet in our solar system what would you choose outside of earth (it's off limits for the question)? Originally Answered: What planet in our solar system would you pick to live on and explore if you could be bio-engineered to live there comfortably an...