🔥 Featured Questions
🔥 Trending:🆕 NewestscienceAIMusicBooksTech & AI
🗂️ Categories:EntertainmentBooksBeauty & SkincareFood & DrinkTech & AIRelationshipsLifestyle & TrendsMoney & FinanceSports
AI just disproved an 80-year-old Erdős math conjecture, verified by a Fields Medalist — but OpenAI's last "Erdős breakthrough" claim was debunked. Real progress or hype cycle?

In May 2026, an OpenAI model made an unexpected cross-disciplinary leap: it linked a 1946 Erdős geometry puzzle (how many pairs of points on a plane can sit exactly one unit apart) to a completely unrelated 1964 algebraic number theory result, and used that connection to construct point arrangements beating every approach mathematicians had tried in 80 years — disproving Erdős's conjecture. Nine mathematicians, including Fields Medalist Tim Gowers, reviewed and confirmed the core ideas, calling it "a milestone in AI mathematics." One day later, Google DeepMind's AlphaProof Nexus independently solved nine more open Erdős problems using Lean, a system that checks proofs line by line rather than relying on a human reading them over. The catch: this isn't the first "AI cracks Erdős problems" headline. In October 2025, an earlier OpenAI claim of solving ten Erdős problems was thoroughly debunked by the math community. This time, unlike last time, independent mathematicians verified the work before it was announced.

🏆 Leading: Handle with skepticism regardless of verification. OpenAI's own track record here includes a debunked claim just seven months earlier, and headline math "breakthroughs" tend to get overstated in the announcement before the dust actually settles. (43%)🥈 This is real, verified original discovery. A genuine sign AI can now generate new science, not just recombine what's already known — and the human verification process by Fields Medalist Tim Gowers and others is exactly how it should work. (29%)🥉 Math is a uniquely easy domain for this. It's the one field where a computer can formally verify an answer is airtight, like DeepMind's Lean-checked proofs the very next day. That doesn't mean AI can do open-ended science in fields where there's no ground truth to check its work against. (29%)🌍 🇨🇳 China
Handle with skepticism regardless of verification. OpenAI's own track record here includes a debunked claim just seven months earlier, and headline math "breakthroughs" tend to get overstated in the announcement before the dust actually settles.
This is real, verified original discovery. A genuine sign AI can now generate new science, not just recombine what's already known — and the human verification process by Fields Medalist Tim Gowers and others is exactly how it should work.
Math is a uniquely easy domain for this. It's the one field where a computer can formally verify an answer is airtight, like DeepMind's Lean-checked proofs the very next day. That doesn't mean AI can do open-ended science in fields where there's no ground truth to check its work against.

Poll as Guest Infographics
Also worth a voteGrok 4.6, Claude Opus 5, Cursor Ultra, Apple's M6 chip - which of this month's releases actually matters?OpenAI Eyes a Possible $1 Trillion IPO by 2027 While Burning Billions: Legitimate AI Bet or a Bubble Waiting to Pop?48% of Americans hope AI cures cancer or Alzheimer's — but only 15% trust the companies building it. Is that optimism justified?
From around the web

Similar to hewsay's "AI just disproved an 80-year-old Erdős math conjecture, verified by a Fields Medalist — but OpenAI's last "Erdős breakthrough" claim was debunked. Real progress or hype cycle?"

Quoted & linked with attribution — not a hewsay user post.
Prime Numbers from previous Prime Numbers : r/math Skip to main contentPrime Numbers from previous Prime Numbers : r/math Open menu Open navigationGo to Reddit Home r/math A chip A close button Log InLog in to Reddit Expand user menu Open settings menu This subreddit is for di...
reddit.com · Reddit
View original
Title: Gerd Faltings wins the 2026 Abel Prize! : r/math # Gerd Faltings wins the 2026 Abel Prize! Skip to main contentGerd Faltings wins the 2026 Abel Prize! Open menu Open navigationGo to Reddit Home. Get App Get the Reddit app Log InLog in to Reddit. Expand user menu Open se...
reddit.com · Reddit
View original
craziest take ever..

believe aliens are real? or that your device is being controlled and your spied on? leave ur opinions down below and we'll see whether your crazy or onto something...

🗳️ 10 votes so far🏆 Leading: leave your take down below! (40%)🥈 twin towers accident was planned and they actually gave us a lot of hints and we were just all too blind to see (40%)🥉 epstein is still alive..? (20%)⚖️ Split decision🌍 🇨🇳 China, 🇭🇰 Hong Kong, 🇩🇪 Germany

Poll as Guest Infographics
Also worth a votewhats the craziest thing that happened to you on the first date?we listen and we dont judge..The Simulation Hypothesis: are we living inside someone else's computer, and could we ever actually prove it?
From around the web

Similar to hewsay's "craziest take ever.."

Quoted & linked with attribution — not a hewsay user post.
[deleted]. •. 9mo ago. PEOPLE ITS HOT TAKE, WILDEST HOT TAKE, YALL JUST BE GIVING THE MOST OBVIOUS TAKES EVER. Thethingnextdoor567. •. 9mo ago.
reddit.com · Reddit
View original
A hot take would be "I think TikTok is a great source of information, and is great for kids.. I also started my own TikTok #Beatsmykids.".
reddit.com · Reddit
View original