Is your 10-step skincare routine actually good for your skin — or good for your feed?
The global skincare market crossed $122 billion in 2025, and some of that growth is getting harder to defend on health grounds alone. In 2024 the "Sephora kids" story went viral for a real reason — nine- and ten-year-olds were photographed stocking up on $70 retinol serums and vitamin-C acids meant for adult skin, and dermatologists (backed by an actual peer-reviewed harms study) started publicly warning about real irritation and barrier damage in young skin. Meanwhile a backlash trend called "skinimalism" — three products, done — has been trending for over a year, with dermatologists calling it the smarter approach all along.
The debate isn't really about whether skincare "works" — most of these ingredients are legitimately backed by dermatology research. It's about what's actually driving the routine: are people layering serums because a dermatologist would recommend it for their specific skin, or because "get ready with me" videos and $40 serum unboxings have turned a bathroom counter into a status display? Is the modern skincare aisle selling skin health, or selling the aesthetic of self-care?
Poll as Guest Infographics
Similar to hewsay's "Is your 10-step skincare routine actually good for your skin — or good for your feed?"
Contrary to the hottest skincare trends at the moment, you don’t need a 10 step skin care routine to have good skin (no matter how aesthetically pleasing it may look on a shelf ). Contrary to the hottest skincare trends at the moment, you don’t need a 10 step skin care routine...
What is a good one-step skin care routine? A one-step skin care routine, I think, is not a thing. A one-step skin care routine, I think, is not a thing. If you are wanting to keep your skin care routine down to 1–2 steps, then the next product I think is a must would be moistu...
OpenAI Eyes a Possible $1 Trillion IPO by 2027 While Burning Billions: Legitimate AI Bet or a Bubble Waiting to Pop?
OpenAI, last valued at roughly 852 billion dollars in a March 2026 funding round, is reportedly preparing for an IPO that could target a valuation of up to 1 trillion dollars and raise 60 billion dollars or more, possibly in late 2026 or 2027. The company's 2025 revenue grew 233 percent to about 20 billion dollars, but it lost roughly 1.22 dollars for every dollar of revenue, and 2026 losses are projected around 14 billion dollars, with cumulative losses potentially reaching 115 billion dollars by 2029 before profitability arrives sometime in the 2030s. OpenAI also missed its own 2026 revenue target of 30 billion dollars, and faces intensifying competition from Google's Gemini, which has reportedly reached about 900 million users, as well as Anthropic and others. Supporters see a category-defining company investing aggressively in a genuine technological shift; skeptics point to governance turmoil, heavy dependence on Microsoft, talent departures, and a widening gap between hype and financial fundamentals.
Poll as Guest Infographics
Similar to hewsay's "OpenAI Eyes a Possible $1 Trillion IPO by 2027 While Burning Billions: Legitimate AI Bet or a Bubble Waiting to Pop?"
# OpenAI reportedly aiming for 1 trillion dollar IPO valuation is this still an opportunity : r/stocks. Skip to main contentOpenAI reportedly aiming for 1 trillion dollar IPO valuation is this still an opportunity : r/stocks. Open menu Open navigationGo to Reddit Home. Get App...
# The AI history that explains fears of a bubble. Concerns among some investors are mounting that the AI sector, which has singlehandedly prevented the economy from sliding into recession, has become an unsustainable bubble. Nvidia, the main supplier of chips used in AI, becam...