📊 poll results
Is remote work more productive than being in the office, or does all the return-to-office pressure from major companies mean the data actually favors being on-site?
🏆 Leading: More productive — no commute, fewer office distractions and meetings that could've been an email, and people manage their own peak hours better than any office schedule does.

More productive — no commute, fewer office distractions and meetings that could've been an email, and people manage their own peak hours better than any office schedule does. is leading so far with 43%.

Less productive — the loss of spontaneous collaboration, mentorship, and company culture more than cancels out any focus-time gains, especially for anyone early in their career. is second. On this few votes the split is still anyone's guess.

Everyone who has answered so far is voting from China.

The most recent vote came in 8 days ago.

hewsay who say wut? 💬
📊 poll results
Is remote work more productive than being in the office, or does all the return-to-office pressure from major companies mean the data actually favors being on-site?
43%
Leading answer
More productive — no commute, fewer office distractions and meetings that could've been an email, and people manage their own peak hours better than any office schedule does.

Discussion

react to this tea 👀
More productive — no commute, fewer office distractions and meetings that could've been an email, and people manage their own peak hours better than any office schedule does.
Less productive — the loss of spontaneous collaboration, mentorship, and company culture more than cancels out any focus-time gains, especially for anyone early in their career.
Neither wins outright — hybrid is genuinely the best of both, and forcing everyone into one extreme ignores that different roles and people need different setups.

Never miss a new question

One email per question, straight to your inbox. Unsubscribe anytime.