πŸ“Š poll results
OpenAI Eyes a Possible $1 Trillion IPO by 2027 While Burning Billions: Legitimate AI Bet or a Bubble Waiting to Pop?
πŸ—³οΈ 17 votes so far πŸ† Leading: The valuation is justified. OpenAI is the clear category leader in a technology shift as significant as the internet or mobile, its revenue is growing extremely fast, and heavy losses now in exchange for market dominance and profitability in the 2030s is a normal, defensible playbook for a company at this stage.

Of 17 votes cast so far, The valuation is justified. OpenAI is the clear category leader in a technology shift as significant as the internet or mobile, its revenue is growing extremely fast, and heavy losses now in exchange for market dominance and profitability in the 2030s is a normal, defensible playbook for a company at this stage. leads with 47%.

This looks like a bubble. Missing its own revenue targets, losing more than a dollar for every dollar earned, and projecting over 100 billion dollars in cumulative losses are the kind of numbers that should worry investors, no matter how important the underlying technology is, and a trillion-dollar price tag prices in years of flawless execution that hasn't happened yet. is second on 35%, 12 points behind.

Everyone who has answered so far is voting from China.

The most recent vote came in 2 days ago.

hewsay who say wut? πŸ’¬
πŸ“Š poll results
OpenAI Eyes a Possible $1 Trillion IPO by 2027 While Burning Billions: Legitimate AI Bet or a Bubble Waiting to Pop?
47%
Leading answer
The valuation is justified. OpenAI is the clear category leader in a technology shift as significant as the internet or mobile, its revenue is growing extremely fast, and heavy losses now in exchange for market dominance and profitability in the 2030s is a normal, defensible playbook for a company at this stage.
17 votes so far
hewsay.com ↗

Discussion

Vote on one of these nextShould Amazon's AI data centers get a pass on emissions because AI is "too important" to slow down?AI just disproved an 80-year-old ErdΕ‘s math conjecture, verified by a Fields Medalist β€” but OpenAI's last "ErdΕ‘s breakthrough" claim was debunked. Real progress or hype cycle?Satya Nadella's $96.5M Pay Raise After 15,000+ Microsoft Layoffs: AI Success Story or Broken Trust With Workers?
react to this tea πŸ‘€
The valuation is justified. OpenAI is the clear category leader in a technology shift as significant as the internet or mobile, its revenue is growing extremely fast, and heavy losses now in exchange for market dominance and profitability in the 2030s is a normal, defensible playbook for a company at this stage.
This looks like a bubble. Missing its own revenue targets, losing more than a dollar for every dollar earned, and projecting over 100 billion dollars in cumulative losses are the kind of numbers that should worry investors, no matter how important the underlying technology is, and a trillion-dollar price tag prices in years of flawless execution that hasn't happened yet.
It's a real business at the wrong price and the wrong moment. OpenAI's technology and user base are genuinely valuable, but heavy Microsoft dependence, an ongoing talent exodus, and fast-rising competition from Google and Anthropic make a trillion-dollar valuation premature until the competitive picture and governance concerns settle down.

Never miss a new question

One email per question, straight to your inbox. Unsubscribe anytime.