πŸ”₯ Featured Questions
The toilet paper "over or under" debate has a 134-year-old answer hiding in a Victorian patent β€” do you actually hang it the "correct" way, or does it just not matter?

In 1891, inventor Seth Wheeler patented the modern perforated toilet paper roll β€” and his own patent diagram clearly shows the paper hanging over the front of the roll, not under. That's been cited for decades as the definitive answer to one of the dumbest fights every household has. Team Under has its own defenses though: it's supposedly better for keeping curious cats and toddlers from unrolling the whole thing, and quieter in wall-mounted holders that rattle. Meanwhile a growing share of people just want everyone to relax about a roll of paper. Where do you land?


Poll as Guest Infographics
From around the web

Similar to hewsay's "The toilet paper "over or under" debate has a 134-year-old answer hiding in a Victorian patent β€” do you actually hang it the "correct" way, or does it just not matter?"

Quoted & linked with attribution — not a hewsay user post.
Why do people argue about what direction the roll of toilet paper faces? I have a cat, and if my cat were to reach up and pull down on the toilet paper all the time like so many do, I’d turn the roll the other way. Originally Answered: Why does it matter which way the toilet p...
quora.com · Quora
View original
So, literally thousand’s of resort hotels have clearly determined that toilet paper must be hung OVER the roll and not under - because it’s the right way! Try other ways to make money on freecash. You try new apps or services, scroll around, share your thoughts, and the next t...
quora.com · Quora
View original
Satya Nadella's $96.5M Pay Raise After 15,000+ Microsoft Layoffs: AI Success Story or Broken Trust With Workers?

In a July 2025 internal memo, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella told employees that the year's layoffs, which ultimately cut more than 15,000 jobs across gaming, security, and management, were "weighing heavily on me," calling the contradiction between record profits and mass cuts the "enigma of success." Months later, proxy filings showed Nadella's fiscal 2025 compensation climbed 22% to a record $96.5 million ($2.5M salary, roughly $9.5M cash bonus, about $84M in stock awards), tied to metrics including Azure and cloud revenue growth as Microsoft's cloud business hit roughly $169 billion (up 23%) and Azure topped $75 billion (up 34%). Former Microsoft HR vice president Chris Williams called it an "accountability issue," saying the optics of a massive CEO pay raise while thousands of employees lose their jobs undermines trust, while Microsoft noted that 10,000 laid-off employees cost roughly $1 billion annually, far more than trimming Nadella's pay could offset. As of today, financial outlets are still revisiting the pay-versus-layoffs math even as Nadella pushes an AI-driven "smarter, leaner" workforce vision, with Microsoft's CEO-to-median-worker pay ratio now near 480-to-1.

A 22% raise to $96.5 million in the same year Microsoft cut more than 15,000 jobs sends a corrosive message about whose sacrifice funds whose reward. Critics like former HR VP Chris Williams argue the optics alone, a nearly 480-to-1 CEO-to-worker pay ratio, expose a governance system that rewards leadership even as rank-and-file employees absorb the cost of the AI transition.
Nadella's pay is performance-based and tied directly to the metrics that matter: total shareholder return, and the Azure/cloud growth that powered Microsoft's AI transformation (34% Azure growth, ~$169B cloud revenue). Layoffs, while painful, are a rational cost of that AI pivot, and rewarding the executive who delivered those results is standard governance, not a scandal.
Both things can be true at once: Nadella's memo language about layoffs "weighing heavily" on him may be sincere, and his pay may be contractually earned, yet the gap between that heartfelt memo and a record payday months later points to a leadership communication problem more than a moral one. The real debate may be whether Microsoft's AI-era compensation structure itself needs reform.

Poll as Guest Infographics
From around the web

Similar to hewsay's "Satya Nadella's $96.5M Pay Raise After 15,000+ Microsoft Layoffs: AI Success Story or Broken Trust With Workers?"

Quoted & linked with attribution — not a hewsay user post.
What is the difference between Bill Gates' Microsoft and Satya Nadella's Microsoft? How has Microsoft changed under Satya Nadella? All this economic surge possible to Microsoft not only because Satya Nadella took over as CEO but also the foundation laid by Bill Gates and Steve...
quora.com · Quora
View original
What was wrong with Microsoft before Satya Nadella joined the company? How has Microsoft changed under Satya Nadella? All this economic surge possible to Microsoft not only because Satya Nadella took over as CEO but also the foundation laid by Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer. How...
quora.com · Quora
View original

Never miss a new question

One email per question, straight to your inbox. Unsubscribe anytime.