🔥 Featured Questions
AI just disproved an 80-year-old Erdős math conjecture, verified by a Fields Medalist — but OpenAI's last "Erdős breakthrough" claim was debunked. Real progress or hype cycle?

In May 2026, an OpenAI model made an unexpected cross-disciplinary leap: it linked a 1946 Erdős geometry puzzle (how many pairs of points on a plane can sit exactly one unit apart) to a completely unrelated 1964 algebraic number theory result, and used that connection to construct point arrangements beating every approach mathematicians had tried in 80 years — disproving Erdős's conjecture. Nine mathematicians, including Fields Medalist Tim Gowers, reviewed and confirmed the core ideas, calling it "a milestone in AI mathematics." One day later, Google DeepMind's AlphaProof Nexus independently solved nine more open Erdős problems using Lean, a system that checks proofs line by line rather than relying on a human reading them over. The catch: this isn't the first "AI cracks Erdős problems" headline. In October 2025, an earlier OpenAI claim of solving ten Erdős problems was thoroughly debunked by the math community. This time, unlike last time, independent mathematicians verified the work before it was announced.

Handle with skepticism regardless of verification. OpenAI's own track record here includes a debunked claim just seven months earlier, and headline math "breakthroughs" tend to get overstated in the announcement before the dust actually settles.
This is real, verified original discovery. A genuine sign AI can now generate new science, not just recombine what's already known — and the human verification process by Fields Medalist Tim Gowers and others is exactly how it should work.
Math is a uniquely easy domain for this. It's the one field where a computer can formally verify an answer is airtight, like DeepMind's Lean-checked proofs the very next day. That doesn't mean AI can do open-ended science in fields where there's no ground truth to check its work against.

Poll as Guest Infographics
From around the web

Similar to hewsay's "AI just disproved an 80-year-old Erdős math conjecture, verified by a Fields Medalist — but OpenAI's last "Erdős breakthrough" claim was debunked. Real progress or hype cycle?"

Quoted & linked with attribution — not a hewsay user post.
Prime Numbers from previous Prime Numbers : r/math Skip to main contentPrime Numbers from previous Prime Numbers : r/math Open menu Open navigationGo to Reddit Home r/math A chip A close button Log InLog in to Reddit Expand user menu Open settings menu This subreddit is for di...
reddit.com · Reddit
View original
Title: Gerd Faltings wins the 2026 Abel Prize! : r/math # Gerd Faltings wins the 2026 Abel Prize! Skip to main contentGerd Faltings wins the 2026 Abel Prize! Open menu Open navigationGo to Reddit Home. Get App Get the Reddit app Log InLog in to Reddit. Expand user menu Open se...
reddit.com · Reddit
View original
OpenAI Eyes a Possible $1 Trillion IPO by 2027 While Burning Billions: Legitimate AI Bet or a Bubble Waiting to Pop?

OpenAI, last valued at roughly 852 billion dollars in a March 2026 funding round, is reportedly preparing for an IPO that could target a valuation of up to 1 trillion dollars and raise 60 billion dollars or more, possibly in late 2026 or 2027. The company's 2025 revenue grew 233 percent to about 20 billion dollars, but it lost roughly 1.22 dollars for every dollar of revenue, and 2026 losses are projected around 14 billion dollars, with cumulative losses potentially reaching 115 billion dollars by 2029 before profitability arrives sometime in the 2030s. OpenAI also missed its own 2026 revenue target of 30 billion dollars, and faces intensifying competition from Google's Gemini, which has reportedly reached about 900 million users, as well as Anthropic and others. Supporters see a category-defining company investing aggressively in a genuine technological shift; skeptics point to governance turmoil, heavy dependence on Microsoft, talent departures, and a widening gap between hype and financial fundamentals.

The valuation is justified. OpenAI is the clear category leader in a technology shift as significant as the internet or mobile, its revenue is growing extremely fast, and heavy losses now in exchange for market dominance and profitability in the 2030s is a normal, defensible playbook for a company at this stage.
This looks like a bubble. Missing its own revenue targets, losing more than a dollar for every dollar earned, and projecting over 100 billion dollars in cumulative losses are the kind of numbers that should worry investors, no matter how important the underlying technology is, and a trillion-dollar price tag prices in years of flawless execution that hasn't happened yet.
It's a real business at the wrong price and the wrong moment. OpenAI's technology and user base are genuinely valuable, but heavy Microsoft dependence, an ongoing talent exodus, and fast-rising competition from Google and Anthropic make a trillion-dollar valuation premature until the competitive picture and governance concerns settle down.

Poll as Guest Infographics
From around the web

Similar to hewsay's "OpenAI Eyes a Possible $1 Trillion IPO by 2027 While Burning Billions: Legitimate AI Bet or a Bubble Waiting to Pop?"

Quoted & linked with attribution — not a hewsay user post.
# OpenAI reportedly aiming for 1 trillion dollar IPO valuation is this still an opportunity : r/stocks. Skip to main contentOpenAI reportedly aiming for 1 trillion dollar IPO valuation is this still an opportunity : r/stocks. Open menu Open navigationGo to Reddit Home. Get App...
reddit.com · Reddit
View original
# The AI history that explains fears of a bubble. Concerns among some investors are mounting that the AI sector, which has singlehandedly prevented the economy from sliding into recession, has become an unsustainable bubble. Nvidia, the main supplier of chips used in AI, becam...
reddit.com · Reddit
View original