If a safe procedure could permanently erase one memory, would you use it?
Memory-dampening drugs like propranolol are already being studied to blunt the emotional sting of traumatic memories, and neuroscientists are inching closer to more targeted memory editing. What used to be pure science fiction is now a real bioethics debate: are we curing suffering, or erasing the parts of ourselves that make us who we are?
🏆 Leading: Yes, for any painful memory — If the technology were safe and reliable, some say they’d erase any memory that causes real pain — heartbreak, embarrassment, grief — the same way you’d remove a splinter. (42%)
🥈 Only for real trauma, not everyday regret — A middle position many land on: reserve memory erasure for genuine trauma like abuse or combat-related PTSD, but leave ordinary regrets and embarrassments intact as part of a normal life. (42%)
🥉 No — even painful memories shape who I am — Others argue that struggle and hardship are woven into identity and personal growth, and erasing them risks erasing part of yourself along with the pain. (17%)⚖️ Split decision🌍 🇨🇳 China, 🇭🇰 Hong Kong, 🇸🇬 SingaporePoll as Guest Infographics
Similar to hewsay's "If a safe procedure could permanently erase one memory, would you use it?"
Is there a medicine to erase unwanted memories? How can I erase memories out of some bodies head? Could erasing memories cure depression? This run-up to 9/11 case study suggests there are significant dangers posed by activists holding positions of authority as lawyers, counsel...
Is it possible to erase selective memory from your brain? Originally Answered: What would happen if we could selectively erase memories from our brain? Is it possible to erase selective memory from your brain? Is it possible to erase selective memory from your brain? Originall...
Moderna Stock Nearly Triples in a Day -- Cancer Breakthrough, Flu Shot Win, or Just a Short Squeeze?
On August 19, 2026, Moderna shares skyrocketed as much as 177% intraday -- the biggest single-day move in company history -- after Moderna and Merck released 5-year Phase 3 data showing their personalized mRNA cancer vaccine, combined with Keytruda, sustained a meaningful reduction in melanoma recurrence. The rally came just two weeks after the FDA approved mFlusiva, Moderna's first mRNA-based flu vaccine for adults 50+, the first mRNA flu shot ever authorized in the US. Because Moderna was heavily shorted going into the announcement, the surge reportedly inflicted roughly $5.5 billion in one-day losses on short sellers, fueling debate over how much of the move is short covering versus a genuine re-rating of the company's pipeline. Reaction has split Wall Street, with some newly bullish on Moderna's expanding mRNA platform, while others warn the stock's valuation has run well ahead of its shrinking COVID/RSV vaccine revenue base.
Poll as Guest Infographics
Similar to hewsay's "Moderna Stock Nearly Triples in a Day -- Cancer Breakthrough, Flu Shot Win, or Just a Short Squeeze?"
Institutions are buying Moderna stock : r/ModernaStock. Skip to main contentInstitutions are buying Moderna stock : r/ModernaStock. Open menu Open navigationGo to Reddit Home. Institutions are buying Moderna stock. Institution investors are holding more than 75% of Moderna sha...
Title: What indicators show a high potential for a short squeeze in a stock? - Quora What indicators show a high potential for a short squeeze in a stock? Key indicators that a stock is poised for a short squeeze fall into three categories: short-interest metrics, market liqui...