If a safe procedure could permanently erase one memory, would you use it?
Memory-dampening drugs like propranolol are already being studied to blunt the emotional sting of traumatic memories, and neuroscientists are inching closer to more targeted memory editing. What used to be pure science fiction is now a real bioethics debate: are we curing suffering, or erasing the parts of ourselves that make us who we are?
🏆 Leading: Yes, for any painful memory — If the technology were safe and reliable, some say they’d erase any memory that causes real pain — heartbreak, embarrassment, grief — the same way you’d remove a splinter. (33%)
🥈 No — even painful memories shape who I am — Others argue that struggle and hardship are woven into identity and personal growth, and erasing them risks erasing part of yourself along with the pain. (33%)
🥉 Only for real trauma, not everyday regret — A middle position many land on: reserve memory erasure for genuine trauma like abuse or combat-related PTSD, but leave ordinary regrets and embarrassments intact as part of a normal life. (33%)🌍 🇨🇳 China, 🇭🇰 Hong Kong, 🇸🇬 SingaporePoll as Guest Infographics
Similar to hewsay's "If a safe procedure could permanently erase one memory, would you use it?"
Is there a medicine to erase unwanted memories? How can I erase memories out of some bodies head? Could erasing memories cure depression? This run-up to 9/11 case study suggests there are significant dangers posed by activists holding positions of authority as lawyers, counsel...
Is it possible to erase selective memory from your brain? Originally Answered: What would happen if we could selectively erase memories from our brain? Is it possible to erase selective memory from your brain? Is it possible to erase selective memory from your brain? Originall...
Moderna Stock Exploded 177% in One Day on a Cancer Vaccine Breakthrough -- Is This Justified Science, Pure Hype, or a Short-Squeeze Overreaction?
On August 19, 2026, Moderna's shares skyrocketed as much as 177% in a single session -- the biggest one-day gain in the company's history -- after it and Merck announced that their personalized mRNA cancer vaccine, intismeran autogene, hit its primary and secondary endpoints in combination with Keytruda in a Phase 3 melanoma trial of over 1,100 patients. The move added roughly $44 billion in market value in hours and instantly vaulted Moderna past every Wall Street analyst's price target, since the stock had carried only a consensus "Hold" rating and a $52.95 average target just the day before. Short sellers, caught badly offside, are estimated to have lost around $5.5 billion in the squeeze. Is this a legitimate re-rating of a real oncology breakthrough, an overexcited bet on a speculative pipeline still years from approval, or a technically-driven overreaction fueled by short covering that could partially unwind?
Poll as Guest Infographics
Similar to hewsay's "Moderna Stock Exploded 177% in One Day on a Cancer Vaccine Breakthrough -- Is This Justified Science, Pure Hype, or a Short-Squeeze Overreaction?"
# AI is curing cancer (Moderna's Intismeran vaccine). It doesn't seem like the connection between AI and Moderna and Merck's breakthrough with its skin cancer vaccine, Intismeran, has been made. Moderna stock (MRNA) has gone up 83% year to date on the news that the vaccine is ...
# I Just Bought $510K Worth of Moderna Stock. r/ModernaStock - I Just Bought $510K Worth of Moderna Stock. Moderna (MRNA) is completely undervalued right now. It's clear that short sellers are driving down the price in the short term, but in the mid-to-long term, I believe the...